Last week, former President Barack Obama did what many Americans have been waiting for—not just from him, but also from Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
He publicly addressed the threat Donald Trump poses to the foundations of American constitutional democracy.
Traditionally, former presidents refrain from criticizing their successors, especially during the early days of a new administration. But this is not a time for tradition.
As Obama made clear, democracy itself is on the line. At Hamilton College, he raised a powerful question: How would Republicans have reacted if a Democratic president had done the things Trump is now doing with such ease?
“Imagine if I had done any of this,” Obama told the crowd. What if he had gone after law firms that opposed the Affordable Care Act the way Trump is targeting firms tied to investigations against him?
What if he had revoked press credentials, like Trump did with the Associated Press? He emphasized how inconceivable it would have been for Republicans—and the media—to stay silent.
Indeed, when Obama once attempted to limit Fox News’ access, the pushback was immediate and intense, leading to a swift policy reversal. So where is that kind of backlash now?
And more importantly, where is George W. Bush?
America needs its former presidents to stand up and speak out against the abuse of power currently taking place.
Bill Clinton, who faced impeachment over a consensual relationship, should not stay quiet while Trump, found liable for sexual assault and convicted of multiple felonies, floats ideas like ignoring court orders, trampling on the rule of law, and violating constitutional term limits.
But it’s George W. Bush whose voice may carry the most weight. As the only living Republican former president with enough moral authority and political clout, he could speak out against Trump and his allies—Elon Musk, J.D. Vance, and border czar Tom Homan—who are openly discussing defying court rulings. Bush could stand in defense of the judiciary and support figures like Chief Justice John Roberts.
Though many, including Obama, disagreed with Bush’s policies, few doubted his commitment to the Constitution. That same assurance cannot be extended to Trump.
In his speech, Obama also made a clear distinction between policy disagreements and fundamental attacks on democratic norms.
Tariffs are one thing, but trying to bully universities, law firms, and judges is another. He challenged institutions to examine their own actions honestly, but also to resist intimidation when they are acting within the law and upholding their values.
“If you’re being intimidated without cause,” Obama said, “then stand up and say so. That’s why we have these big endowments—to protect our principles.”
Disclaimer- Our team has thoroughly fact-checked this article to ensure its accuracy and maintain its credibility. We are committed to providing honest and reliable content for our readers.