Read in English.
Following the Trump administration’s decision to release over $7 million in frozen funds for K–12 educational programs, some Connecticut lawmakers responded with alivio, while others expressed frustration.
On June 30, Connecticut’s school districts entered that their funds, which had previously been approved by Congress, were under review to ensure that the subsidies aligned with President Donald Trump’s priorities. This party includes more than $53 million for Connecticut districts that have state funds available on July 1.
Jennifer Leeper, a Democrat from Fairfield, is the state representative and the chair of the Connecticut Education Committee. According to her, the congelation of these funds created a difficult situation in the districts by causing chaos and unneeded anxiety in the system before to the start of the school year.
Leeper explains, “If you are unsure of how much money you will receive, you can try to find out if I can reimburse those funds.” And frequently, those are the places where people go to help students who need this extra support.
These funds cover assistance for students who may have disabilities or who are learning multiple languages, specifically. The J venes desconectados, who are students, are at risk of leaving the school or have already left it, and they have also been seen to be impacted.
The Republican leadership in the General Assembly also agrees with the release of the funds, but he detests the federal government’s minucia.
Republicans applaud a president who is willing to pose difficult questions: How is this money being used? “Really beneficial to our students?” asked Vincent Candelora, a minor in the C mara of representatives (R-North Branford), and Lezlye Zupkus, a state representative (R-Prospect), who is a high-ranking member of the Comit de Educaci n.
As a result, the dem cratas only have one more chance to appear in court. They have shown little interest in taking on responsibilities. In a statement, they said that their only goal was to incite outrage, send preemptive messages, and claim false victories that had no effect on the students’ performance.
Numerous municipalities are impacted, with the most affected cities being
The consolidation of funds has impacted the majority of Connecticut’s cities and municipalities, according to the Proyecto de Financiaci n Escolar y Estatal, a nonpartisan political organization without a lucro.
These resources are essential for maintaining the programs and services that our districts use to support the students, as stated in a communication from the Connecticut Department of Education. Additionally, the Department of Education in the EE. UU. stated in an official advisory that fund releases will begin the week of July 28. The state agency guarantees that more information will be shared with the superintendents and beneficiaries as long as [the funds] are available.
According to the report, only a few municipalities were found to be unaffected by the congelation.
The majority of funds were produced in the school districts of Connecticut’s major cities, including Hartford, Waterbury, New Haven, and Bridgeport, each of which is expected to receive $3 million.
The majority of states, including Connecticut, demanded that the Trump administration mediate the July fund freeze.In the demand, it is claimed that the federal law requires the administration to fund programs for English language learners, the children of migrant workers, and programs aimed at enhancing the English language and technology in the classroom.
The measure also caused a great deal of disapproval among the members of both parties’ Congresses, including independent letters from several members of the House of Representatives and ten Republican senators, all of whom were supporting the administration and Trump’s efforts to restore the millions of dollars in funds.
State Senator Doug McCrory (D-Hartford), the chair of the Education Committee, also supported the measure’s revocation. It is believed that educational systems with little funding, like the Hartford system, would have been devastated by the adida scandal.
It is necessary to recruit people to fill positions in the educational system, and the potential for them to be recruited made the situation more precarious, according to McCrory.
