In a growing land dispute that’s caught the attention of New Jersey residents, the Hlubik family in Chesterfield is pushing back against the township’s attempt to seize their 75-acre family farm through eminent domain to make way for an affordable housing development.
The Hlubiks have been farming this land for over 80 years. For them, it’s more than just property—it’s a way of life, a family legacy, and the foundation of their identity in the community. But now, they say, the township is threatening to take it all away in the name of progress.
According to township officials, Chesterfield is legally obligated to provide more affordable housing options as part of a state-mandated plan.
They believe the Hlubik farm is the best available spot to build those homes. But the Hlubik family strongly disagrees. “We are not against affordable housing,” said Jerry Hlubik. “But we are against the way they are doing this.”
The family has publicly voiced concerns that the town is ignoring better, more suitable locations for development and is targeting their farm simply because it’s open land.
They argue the land is still being actively used for farming and is not idle or abandoned. Losing the farm would not just take away their livelihood, but would also strip the area of one of its last remaining agricultural spaces.
Their legal battle centers around eminent domain, a law that allows government entities to take private land for public use, provided they offer fair compensation.
However, the definition of “public use” has been controversial, especially when it comes to private developments like housing. The Hlubiks say the town is misusing this power.
In February, the town council voted to move forward with acquiring the land after claiming negotiations with the family failed. The Hlubiks deny that and say they were never fairly approached. Now, they’re preparing to fight back in court.
Local supporters have rallied behind the family, calling the town’s move aggressive and unjust. Many argue that development shouldn’t come at the cost of family farms, especially in a town with strong agricultural roots.
Community members have expressed concern that losing this land to housing will permanently change the character of Chesterfield.
A petition to support the Hlubiks has been circulating online, gathering hundreds of signatures. Many residents are demanding transparency in the town’s decision-making process and are asking officials to consider alternative properties for the project.
Meanwhile, township officials insist they followed the legal process. They say they’ve tried to reach an agreement with the Hlubiks but were left with no other option when talks stalled.
They also point to deadlines from the state for fulfilling affordable housing requirements, adding pressure to act quickly.
This conflict highlights the broader debate in many parts of the U.S.—how to balance growth with preservation. Affordable housing is a growing need, but finding space for it often leads to clashes with long-time property owners.
In Chesterfield’s case, the tension has been amplified by the emotional weight of losing a generational farm.
For the Hlubiks, the battle is deeply personal. They say they’re not just defending property, they’re protecting memories, hard work, and a commitment to keeping agriculture alive in their town. “This is our home,” Jerry Hlubik said. “
It’s where we raised our family. It’s where our grandchildren come to learn about farming and hard work. We’re not going to give it up without a fight.”
As the legal case unfolds, all eyes are on Chesterfield to see whether the town proceeds with the acquisition or considers other options.
The outcome could set a precedent for future eminent domain cases involving farmland and raise important questions about development priorities in small-town America.